www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-sci-food12jan12,1,3643830.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
January 12, 2005
THE NATION
Cancer Study Re-Indicts Red, Processed Meats
Colorectal
malignancies rose by up to 50% among a high-consumption group.
Benefits of fruits, vegetables downgraded.
By Rosie Mestel, Times Staff Writer
Adding weight to earlier findings, a study of nearly 150,000
adults has found that eating too many red and processed meats
raises a person's risk for colorectal cancer by up to 50%.
Meanwhile, another study of 285,526 European women has found that
eating lots of fruits and vegetables does not lower a woman's risk
for breast cancer, refuting some earlier studies
Experts said that both studies were large and carefully conducted
and thus important in better defining the often murky relationship
between cancer and people's eating habits — with implications for
consumers.
The study on meat and cancer, published today in the Journal of the
American Medical Assn., was conducted by Ann Chao of the American
Cancer Society and colleagues using data from 148,610 men and women
aged 50 to 74 in 21 states.
The scientists found that the group that ate the most red meat over
the long term (defined as an average of at least three ounces daily
for men and two ounces for women) had a 30% to 40% increased risk of
rectal cancer or cancer of the distal colon (the portion of the
colon nearest the rectum) compared to those whose consumption was
lowest (less than 1.5 ounces daily for men, and one ounce for
women.)
High consumption of processed meats was associated with a 50%
increase in cancers of the distal colon. There were 1,667 colorectal
cancers during the course of the study.
"If you're going to eat red meat, you should choose smaller
portions, leaner cuts, and you should try to get your protein less
from red and processed meats and more from fish, poultry, nuts and
beans, " said Eugenia Calle, senior author of the paper and
director of analytic epidemiology at the American Cancer Society.
Calle said that scientists do not know enough to recommend a maximum
daily intake of red meat, or what component of the meat might cause
risk: It might be fat, nitrates, cancer-promoting chemicals caused
via cooking, or some other factor.
The second study, also published in the medical journal, was
conducted by a team of scientists based at the University Medical
Center in Utrecht, in the Netherlands. The study looked at women
aged 25 to 70 from 10 European countries with very different
patterns of fruit and vegetable consumption.
By 2002, the researchers recorded 3,659 new cases of breast cancer
in the group. The rate was no different for those who ate many or
few fruits and vegetables.
Dr. Petra M. Peeters, a principal investigator on the study and an
epidemiologist at the University Medical Center, said the finding
was in line with several recent studies.
Dr. Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at
Harvard School of Public Health, who wrote a commentary accompanying
the two reports, said people should still eat lots of fruits and
vegetables.
"The benefits are quite clear for reducing risk of heart
disease and that's the No. 1 killer of both men and women," he
said.
|